{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-92","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-92)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-25","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:49273d","proof":"sha256:12468773e09ceec621b5c7e3b9e8126afea236850331c186cc5e253c463a6d23","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"RÅ 1995 ref. 92, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-ra-1995-92","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-92","inLanguage":"sv","about":"RÅ 1995 ref. 92, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad domstolen sa: Vid bedömande av en hjälpsökandes behov av bistånd enligt 6 § socialtjänstlagen har ett erbjudande om sysselsättning, för vilken utgått ersättning med socialbidrag och ett mindre stimulansbidrag, inte ansetts innebära att den hjälpsökandes behov kunnat tillgodoses på annat sätt.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1995."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-92","softwareVersion":"2172ab9820a2632f","citation":"avgorande-ra-1995-92, RÅ 1995 ref. 92, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-92 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:71ef41a86ef13498, bygge legal-2026-09-25).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1995-92/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:12468773e09ceec621b5c7e3b9e8126afea236850331c186cc5e253c463a6d23","version":"legal-2026-09-25","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-25+legal-2026-09-25+2026-09-25T21:24:40","content_hash":"sha256:12468773e09ceec621b5c7e3b9e8126afea236850331c186cc5e253c463a6d23","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T04:09:21.718Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-92","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1995-92/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}