{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-74",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:789f6dd6c55d9bfa62c5a1d89938e28a5c02e140dc92a0d9b20a7bc25a11fd5d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 1995 ref. 74, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-1995-74",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-74",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 1995 ref. 74, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När föräldrar haft gemensam vårdnad om ett barn har den ene av föräldrarna inte utan den andres samtycke ansetts ha rätt att överklaga skattemyndighetens beslut om barnets folkbokföring.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1995. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-74",
  "softwareVersion": "5837f3080a0785e0",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-1995-74, RÅ 1995 ref. 74, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-74 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5b761f74f2ea85e8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1995-74/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:789f6dd6c55d9bfa62c5a1d89938e28a5c02e140dc92a0d9b20a7bc25a11fd5d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:789f6dd6c55d9bfa62c5a1d89938e28a5c02e140dc92a0d9b20a7bc25a11fd5d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:07:10.939Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-74",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}