{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-24","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-24)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:a87bf5","proof":"sha256:2ff4550a0d1b45e8f9f47056687e4ac4482459156cc942aa25945b78f213db08","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"RÅ 1995 ref. 24, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-ra-1995-24","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-24","inLanguage":"sv","about":"Fråga om taxebesluten stått i strid med likställighetsprincipen","abstract":["Vad som hände: Kommunfullmäktige har beslutat om barnomsorgstaxa, som varit oberoende dels av antalet barn inom omsorgen från varje familj dels av den tid som varje barn utnyttjat (I) eller som varit oberoende av den tid som barnet utnyttjat (II).","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1995."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-24","softwareVersion":"5176f231dc13860f","citation":"avgorande-ra-1995-24, RÅ 1995 ref. 24, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-24 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:eb3d60726b290907, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1995-24/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:2ff4550a0d1b45e8f9f47056687e4ac4482459156cc942aa25945b78f213db08","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T05:14:22","content_hash":"sha256:2ff4550a0d1b45e8f9f47056687e4ac4482459156cc942aa25945b78f213db08","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T06:33:20.581Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1995-24","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1995-24/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}