{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-8",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b048c27def1eb309cc6670a27b2d895fa0d025131ab3adcb20cec209380b6a56",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2025:8, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2025-8",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-8",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2025:8, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Resningsärende.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har bestämt tiden för sluten ungdomsvård utan att redovisa hur rätten har förhållit sig till frågan om frihetsberövandet bör reduceras med hänsyn till att någon villkorlig frigivning inte kan ske.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2025."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-8",
  "softwareVersion": "3a0fcef91c3d464c",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2025-8, NJA 2025:8, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-8 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:b88427a1de8b7fde, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2025-8/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b048c27def1eb309cc6670a27b2d895fa0d025131ab3adcb20cec209380b6a56",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b048c27def1eb309cc6670a27b2d895fa0d025131ab3adcb20cec209380b6a56",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T13:05:13.776Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-8",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}