{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-58",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:44eb0bdd003073553cb932b9388cbbe3d9e1b55dbbd9fd9f2fea55174ef10096",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2025:58, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2025-58",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-58",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2025:58, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Bättre rätt till meteorit.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Särskilt frågan om en meteorit ska anses utgöra en del av den fasta egendom som den fallit ned på eller om den ska anses som lös egendom.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2025."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-58",
  "softwareVersion": "c322c807ac09e1fe",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2025-58, NJA 2025:58, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-58 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:344e6d92033d0b8a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2025-58/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:44eb0bdd003073553cb932b9388cbbe3d9e1b55dbbd9fd9f2fea55174ef10096",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:44eb0bdd003073553cb932b9388cbbe3d9e1b55dbbd9fd9f2fea55174ef10096",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:07:51.507Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-58",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}