{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-62",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:81d24064d82be2ef655a13ba7f9259fc3c377f8d996e17d08695b96d3c58e963",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2024:62, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2024-62",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-62",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2024:62, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Behörigheten enligt den tidigare fullmakten har trots detta inte kunnat göras gällande av en tredje man som borde ha förstått att fullmaktsgivarens avsikt var att genom den nya fullmakten begränsa fullmäktigens behörighet (20 § avtalslagen).",
    "Vad domstolen sa: En fullmakt har inte ansetts vara återkallad på föreskrivet sätt genom att fullmaktsgivaren utfärdat en ny fullmakt med inskränkt behörighet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2024. Tillämpar Avtalslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-62",
  "softwareVersion": "6ed49d63bbec95e4",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2024-62, NJA 2024:62, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-62 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:bdb22a1799894d9f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2024-62/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:81d24064d82be2ef655a13ba7f9259fc3c377f8d996e17d08695b96d3c58e963",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:81d24064d82be2ef655a13ba7f9259fc3c377f8d996e17d08695b96d3c58e963",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:08:43.120Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2024-62",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}