{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-808",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a51cc5779ab51ad68905223590aa40bc1db96537ccbb4cb34336f055cb00d8f2",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2022 s. 808, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2022-s-808",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-808",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2022 s. 808, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: 1.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Om en privatperson begär ersättning för en timmes rättslig rådgivning och det framgår att han eller hon anlitat professionell juridisk hjälp, finns det normalt inte skäl för domstolen att kräva närmare utredning om det arbete som lagts ned eller partens kostnad för detta",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2022."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-808",
  "softwareVersion": "98e1212562711cfc",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2022-s-808, NJA 2022 s. 808, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-808 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ae898de0783509f5, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2022-s-808/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a51cc5779ab51ad68905223590aa40bc1db96537ccbb4cb34336f055cb00d8f2",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a51cc5779ab51ad68905223590aa40bc1db96537ccbb4cb34336f055cb00d8f2",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:20:11.609Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-808",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}