{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-445",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:847bbbb7dd17fffe7fd3dfc4154c7f8b2d8679b8dba998ae78470ca5aa285cde",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2022 s. 445, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2022-s-445",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-445",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2022 s. 445, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Eftersom en distansförsvarare varit väl insatt i målet och kostnaderna inte blivit avsevärt högre än för en lokalt verksam försvarare, har det funnits särskilda skäl att betala ersättning för merkostnader för tidsspillan och utlägg.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2022."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-445",
  "softwareVersion": "ccbe5e83f619ebfa",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2022-s-445, NJA 2022 s. 445, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-445 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:02b9421ec4786a59, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2022-s-445/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:847bbbb7dd17fffe7fd3dfc4154c7f8b2d8679b8dba998ae78470ca5aa285cde",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:847bbbb7dd17fffe7fd3dfc4154c7f8b2d8679b8dba998ae78470ca5aa285cde",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:22:08.512Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-445",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}