{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-1110",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:244bc00e0c787846df7646777d7abf27e69d995fb758dbd938d7ae9693b5dee9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2022 s. 1110, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2022-s-1110",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-1110",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2022 s. 1110, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Det har inte ansetts möjligt att döma ut vite när en målsägande som har förelagts att inställa sig personligen har infunnit sig tillsammans med sitt barn och förhandlingen därför inte har kunnat genomföras.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2022."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-1110",
  "softwareVersion": "0b3736c2560f57eb",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2022-s-1110, NJA 2022 s. 1110, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-1110 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:8bfa65a93650c236, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2022-s-1110/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:244bc00e0c787846df7646777d7abf27e69d995fb758dbd938d7ae9693b5dee9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:244bc00e0c787846df7646777d7abf27e69d995fb758dbd938d7ae9693b5dee9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T13:16:05.416Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2022-s-1110",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}