{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-791",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b67c56894eced05b170bcf9826b803288397ee0246ac94e4d7061dcbf92e2b3d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2021 s. 791, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2021-s-791",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-791",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2021 s. 791, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid en samlad bedömning har det inte ansetts finnas skäl att frångå advokatsamfundets disciplinnämnds ställningstagande att en advokat uppsåtligen har gjort orätt och därmed ska uteslutas ur samfundet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-791",
  "softwareVersion": "ff8f79250b1ec93b",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2021-s-791, NJA 2021 s. 791, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-791 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4cf53eeeb7c1856d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2021-s-791/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b67c56894eced05b170bcf9826b803288397ee0246ac94e4d7061dcbf92e2b3d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b67c56894eced05b170bcf9826b803288397ee0246ac94e4d7061dcbf92e2b3d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:10:47.658Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-791",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}