{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-547",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9795a0dc3b22f5fa11c89e5241e428a10633bc79ff2ad85cc61f4441c1eab31c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2021 s. 547, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2021-s-547",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-547",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2021 s. 547, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den som är god man (I) eller förvaltare (II) är bara under vissa förutsättningar behörig att ansöka om äktenskapsskillnad för den enskildes räkning, när denne inte själv kan uttrycka sin mening.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2021. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-547",
  "softwareVersion": "6098ecd34ce9d9d6",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2021-s-547, NJA 2021 s. 547, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-547 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ec037fe24c549a04, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2021-s-547/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9795a0dc3b22f5fa11c89e5241e428a10633bc79ff2ad85cc61f4441c1eab31c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9795a0dc3b22f5fa11c89e5241e428a10633bc79ff2ad85cc61f4441c1eab31c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:11:16.801Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-547",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}