{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-182",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e05f88ef5ba624ca5b59717263685a3e3e2457eca41aaeee955b01511db8cc8a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2021 s. 182, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2021-s-182",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-182",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2021 s. 182, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När ett kompletteringsföreläggande inte behöver delges krävs det mer än ett påstående om att föreläggandet inte har kommit parten till handa för att laga förfall ska anses föreligga.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2021."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-182",
  "softwareVersion": "be26fd04a03b5dd5",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2021-s-182, NJA 2021 s. 182, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-182 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1d36369f26f88ee1, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2021-s-182/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e05f88ef5ba624ca5b59717263685a3e3e2457eca41aaeee955b01511db8cc8a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e05f88ef5ba624ca5b59717263685a3e3e2457eca41aaeee955b01511db8cc8a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:08:59.919Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2021-s-182",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}