{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-470",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0794ed33efe8e06e036527d08081ef710a0dbc6a3e008ef7228b1fc95a62c876",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2020 s. 470, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2020-s-470",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-470",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2020 s. 470, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Om det i ett köpeavtal avseende fast egendom finns ett villkor om att köpebrev ska upprättas när köpeskillingen är betald, krävs en hävningsförklaring om säljaren inte vill stå fast vid köpet vid köparens betalningsdröjsmål.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2020. Tillämpar Köplagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-470",
  "softwareVersion": "193d1c22c94e0bc0",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2020-s-470, NJA 2020 s. 470, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-470 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:fae690d90ef308c9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2020-s-470/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0794ed33efe8e06e036527d08081ef710a0dbc6a3e008ef7228b1fc95a62c876",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0794ed33efe8e06e036527d08081ef710a0dbc6a3e008ef7228b1fc95a62c876",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:10:47.841Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-470",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}