{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-397",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:dba466fc424935a5e752b13e3846007fdc5c2a16428d112b2c0a701133a5944a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2020 s. 397, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2020-s-397",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-397",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2020 s. 397, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En person som sålt särskilt farliga och svårdoserade preparat via en webbplats har ansetts göra sig skyldig till vållande till annans död när personer dött till följd av att de använt preparaten i missbrukssyfte.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2020."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-397",
  "softwareVersion": "355196391dd90c64",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2020-s-397, NJA 2020 s. 397, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-397 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3dbd028f1ec9d5a7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2020-s-397/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:dba466fc424935a5e752b13e3846007fdc5c2a16428d112b2c0a701133a5944a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:dba466fc424935a5e752b13e3846007fdc5c2a16428d112b2c0a701133a5944a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:23:00.580Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-397",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}