{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-1142",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:962c0c5a1a597a118bfb77929366cf385b865cfd2cfa9eb6bf6ef5e77f4357c5",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2020 s. 1142, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2020-s-1142",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-1142",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2020 s. 1142, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Schablonersättningen för den sveda och värk som till följd av ett uppsåtligt dödande åsamkats någon som stod den avlidne särskilt nära har tillämpats även då ett barn bevittnat mordet på sin mor.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2020."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-1142",
  "softwareVersion": "2aaa80f4ca27833c",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2020-s-1142, NJA 2020 s. 1142, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-1142 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4a9b4d9c00f7ebb4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2020-s-1142/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:962c0c5a1a597a118bfb77929366cf385b865cfd2cfa9eb6bf6ef5e77f4357c5",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:962c0c5a1a597a118bfb77929366cf385b865cfd2cfa9eb6bf6ef5e77f4357c5",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:20:44.784Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-1142",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}