{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-622",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b65687daa540970da7f1e8df1de7b486c84091daa9dec714a274c4887e78c9c7",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2019 s. 622, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2019-s-622",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-622",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2019 s. 622, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Tingsrätten på den ort där den skadegörande handlingen företogs eller skadan uppkom är behörig att pröva ett mål om ersättning enligt trafikskadelagen, även om talan förs mot det egna trafikförsäkringsbolaget.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2019."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-622",
  "softwareVersion": "e3d11e624e1cd6e1",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2019-s-622, NJA 2019 s. 622, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-622 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:eed9cdf840f543f2, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2019-s-622/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b65687daa540970da7f1e8df1de7b486c84091daa9dec714a274c4887e78c9c7",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b65687daa540970da7f1e8df1de7b486c84091daa9dec714a274c4887e78c9c7",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:10:01.816Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-622",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}