{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-1041",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6f1f28c01b47d28aa50e8dd572be98fbf65330f15b19738926c5b1b637797e2e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2019 s. 1041, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2019-s-1041",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-1041",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2019 s. 1041, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Straffrättens legalitetsprincip.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Innehav av vapen för dödsbos räkning har ansetts inte kunna föranleda straffansvar för vapenbrott, när inte Polismyndigheten beslutat att vapnet ska lämnas in för inlösen eller förvaring.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2019."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-1041",
  "softwareVersion": "9d7b6a0811afe6a8",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2019-s-1041, NJA 2019 s. 1041, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-1041 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:27c0fe300104c36a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2019-s-1041/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6f1f28c01b47d28aa50e8dd572be98fbf65330f15b19738926c5b1b637797e2e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6f1f28c01b47d28aa50e8dd572be98fbf65330f15b19738926c5b1b637797e2e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:09:52.160Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-1041",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}