{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-649",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0519e1add4ab39eb7259df83ef3f47488f8a466ecf49af751e610857c1dfcde6",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2018 s. 649, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2018-s-649",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-649",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2018 s. 649, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den som har brukat narkotika som tidigare utgjort del av eget innehav ska som huvudregel inte ersätta staten för rättegångskostnad för provtagning och undersökning, om kostnaden avser utredning som gäller bruket av narkotikan.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2018."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-649",
  "softwareVersion": "79886f84aa5b8eb8",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2018-s-649, NJA 2018 s. 649, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-649 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f929cba76e951641, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2018-s-649/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0519e1add4ab39eb7259df83ef3f47488f8a466ecf49af751e610857c1dfcde6",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0519e1add4ab39eb7259df83ef3f47488f8a466ecf49af751e610857c1dfcde6",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:06:24.944Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-649",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}