{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-467",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:25d8264d6b3f68a288c3093891130a874ccb92e13a2f81080c5c79fabd6f5477",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2018 s. 467, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2018-s-467",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-467",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2018 s. 467, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Klagointresse.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten ska utgå från att ett regressansvar mot betalaren föreligger, om det inte framstår som uppenbart att sådant ansvar saknas (jfr \"AQ Enclosure Systems\" NJA 2010 s. 448).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2018."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-467",
  "softwareVersion": "e056d45c5cad5709",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2018-s-467, NJA 2018 s. 467, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-467 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5835d6726afcd354, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2018-s-467/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:25d8264d6b3f68a288c3093891130a874ccb92e13a2f81080c5c79fabd6f5477",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:25d8264d6b3f68a288c3093891130a874ccb92e13a2f81080c5c79fabd6f5477",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:06:19.425Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-467",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}