{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-1083",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:d7e24608617ca5477a60fd265cfafadd56df262e01be2103160a9d4c515294f7",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2018 s. 1083, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2018-s-1083",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-1083",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2018 s. 1083, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: När en domstol ska bestämma kränkningsersättning för upprepade brottsliga handlingar som har samband med varandra är det den samlade kränkning som den skadelidande typiskt sett drabbas av genom angreppen som är avgörande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2018."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-1083",
  "softwareVersion": "63d18f72b3a8a804",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2018-s-1083, NJA 2018 s. 1083, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-1083 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:91d6faca5a20afb9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2018-s-1083/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:d7e24608617ca5477a60fd265cfafadd56df262e01be2103160a9d4c515294f7",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d7e24608617ca5477a60fd265cfafadd56df262e01be2103160a9d4c515294f7",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:08:46.311Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-1083",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}