{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-882",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6590207e209918b5c5dafd7b003c643a8c8876c73bfc29e01ac75446629fdb80",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2017 s. 882, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-882",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-882",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2017 s. 882, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid återvinning enligt 4 kap. 5 § konkurslagen har det subjektiva rekvisitet, att medkontrahenten borde ha känt till gäldenärens insolvens, ansetts innefatta en undersökningsplikt för medkontrahenten i de situationer där omständigheterna är ägnade att väcka misstankar om gäldenärens insolvens.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-882",
  "softwareVersion": "93bfcfa72cd2a8bd",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-882, NJA 2017 s. 882, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-882 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a6fc8b723b44c2be, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2017-s-882/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6590207e209918b5c5dafd7b003c643a8c8876c73bfc29e01ac75446629fdb80",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6590207e209918b5c5dafd7b003c643a8c8876c73bfc29e01ac75446629fdb80",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:08:56.536Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-882",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}