{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-68",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:46d3baeeb71d5f4beb5bcd93090a1746af485d9c395a48f004e529fd5643112f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2017 s. 68, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-68",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-68",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2017 s. 68, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Endast en tilläggsavgift ska tas ut när ett mål om betalningsföreläggande har överlämnats till tingsrätt, även om det överlämnade målet vid tingsrätten handläggs som flera tvistemål enligt rättegångsbalken.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-68",
  "softwareVersion": "a7f3174de50a98a2",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-68, NJA 2017 s. 68, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-68 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:628d8ac7458f23ee, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2017-s-68/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:46d3baeeb71d5f4beb5bcd93090a1746af485d9c395a48f004e529fd5643112f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:46d3baeeb71d5f4beb5bcd93090a1746af485d9c395a48f004e529fd5643112f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T13:06:47.795Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-68",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}