{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1135",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0120aa5ceeba73debcd6c577cd3384edd2d2a161df302ac187b0714a9e1b27a0",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2017 s. 1135, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-1135",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1135",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2017 s. 1135, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En person, som inte gett in deklaration enligt skatteförfarandelagen, har med hänsyn till omständigheterna ansetts skyldig att ersätta kostnaden för en konkursansökan som återkallats efter det att han fullgjort sin deklarationsskyldighet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1135",
  "softwareVersion": "10d895acf5316c55",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-1135, NJA 2017 s. 1135, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1135 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:7e13ec8956e3b15d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2017-s-1135/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0120aa5ceeba73debcd6c577cd3384edd2d2a161df302ac187b0714a9e1b27a0",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0120aa5ceeba73debcd6c577cd3384edd2d2a161df302ac187b0714a9e1b27a0",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:07:47.604Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1135",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}