{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1045",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:868fd0a9d1cad78deb49d88c7e820d904d3c347fb99f2febb68f26721c0083bd",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2017 s. 1045, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-1045",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1045",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2017 s. 1045, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En anteckning i fastighetsregistret om att förvärvet av en fastighet genom gåva var förenat med förbehåll kan tas bort om det inte framgår av anteckningen vad förbehållet avser och gåvobrevet inte kan återfinnas.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2017."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1045",
  "softwareVersion": "9ebda1781196af74",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2017-s-1045, NJA 2017 s. 1045, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1045 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:9c61dc5f339493b9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2017-s-1045/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:868fd0a9d1cad78deb49d88c7e820d904d3c347fb99f2febb68f26721c0083bd",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:868fd0a9d1cad78deb49d88c7e820d904d3c347fb99f2febb68f26721c0083bd",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:18:24.606Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-1045",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}