{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-922",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ba27de914534c523ff81838e75f8e79d91a68d8c0d1ad80707e35b80e7d37f4f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2016 s. 922, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2016-s-922",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-922",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2016 s. 922, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En ansökan om särskild handräckning har ansetts inte kunna bifallas beträffande ett landstings begäran om att en läkare enligt 26 § lagen (1993:1651) om läkarvårdsersättning ska lämna upplysningar och visa upp patientjournaler samt övrigt material som rör undersökning, vård eller behandling av en patient.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-922",
  "softwareVersion": "969a52fb1f5c3bb8",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2016-s-922, NJA 2016 s. 922, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-922 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:efb4e39b4f16c578, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2016-s-922/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ba27de914534c523ff81838e75f8e79d91a68d8c0d1ad80707e35b80e7d37f4f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ba27de914534c523ff81838e75f8e79d91a68d8c0d1ad80707e35b80e7d37f4f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:08:21.355Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-922",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}