{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-844",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a3e2a2c353a39b5b1bc7cf1bf9b8fec40d9c0eb16dee0913385aa8802a2b5691",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2016 s. 844, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2016-s-844",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-844",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2016 s. 844, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett beslut om att upphäva en skuldsanering måste få laga kraft innan en borgenär, vars fordran omfattats av skuldsaneringen, kan få utmätning på grund av den ursprungliga exekutionstiteln.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-844",
  "softwareVersion": "db2e40dca14be39e",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2016-s-844, NJA 2016 s. 844, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-844 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d67150fffdd1faaa, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2016-s-844/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a3e2a2c353a39b5b1bc7cf1bf9b8fec40d9c0eb16dee0913385aa8802a2b5691",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a3e2a2c353a39b5b1bc7cf1bf9b8fec40d9c0eb16dee0913385aa8802a2b5691",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:11:01.139Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-844",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}