{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-1186",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0c0021354c5699ebbc80208b5c9a8dd77f0872c5c2c87149bca40e52fba2223d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2016 s. 1186, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2016-s-1186",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-1186",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2016 s. 1186, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Om ett avtal som en konkursförvaltare har ingått för boet varit oförmånligt, ska frågan om förvaltarens ansvar för boets skada prövas genom klander av slutredovisningen och inte inom ramen för prövningen av hans arvode.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2016."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-1186",
  "softwareVersion": "814eefe683d8185e",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2016-s-1186, NJA 2016 s. 1186, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-1186 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:19b18498a6ceaa9a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2016-s-1186/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0c0021354c5699ebbc80208b5c9a8dd77f0872c5c2c87149bca40e52fba2223d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0c0021354c5699ebbc80208b5c9a8dd77f0872c5c2c87149bca40e52fba2223d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:17:59.324Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2016-s-1186",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}