{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2015-s-374",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:357e490bfd1cbb31d4ca6ded9a833b3a28b5e5d87b27ecff539b0becd8c06901",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2015 s. 374, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2015-s-374",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2015-s-374",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2015 s. 374, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En enskild som vinner ett överklagat utmätningsmål som avser fordran på skatt, böter eller liknande har rätt till ersättning av staten för rättegångskostnader som har varit befogade med hänsyn till sakens beskaffenhet. (Målet avgjort av HD i dess helhet och antecknat i HD:s minnesbok.)",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2015."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2015-s-374",
  "softwareVersion": "58eead8e76c23203",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2015-s-374, NJA 2015 s. 374, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2015-s-374 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:01be1c8a0395a113, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2015-s-374/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:357e490bfd1cbb31d4ca6ded9a833b3a28b5e5d87b27ecff539b0becd8c06901",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:357e490bfd1cbb31d4ca6ded9a833b3a28b5e5d87b27ecff539b0becd8c06901",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:09:29.191Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2015-s-374",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}