{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-929",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a73ed90b7b18390255d2153bce535558b06d2bdbafbb1db24536087a71ccaf43",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2014 s. 929, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2014-s-929",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-929",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2014 s. 929, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Tillfällig uppställning av ett fordon vid privat transport av en rörelsehindrad person, som behövde hjälp efter att hon kommit ut ur fordonet, har ansetts utgöra parkering som omfattas av undantaget från parkeringsförbud i 11 kap. 9 § första stycket 7 trafikförordningen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2014."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-929",
  "softwareVersion": "af5c042e8175aff6",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2014-s-929, NJA 2014 s. 929, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-929 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:45f4238adf9e61f8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2014-s-929/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a73ed90b7b18390255d2153bce535558b06d2bdbafbb1db24536087a71ccaf43",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a73ed90b7b18390255d2153bce535558b06d2bdbafbb1db24536087a71ccaf43",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:12:02.416Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-929",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}