{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-245",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:19e5f7726aaae664848d8600a30e253a891e0305db6d949f78de989b0ff4dc4d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2014 s. 245, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2014-s-245",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-245",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2014 s. 245, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Meddelande av påföljdseftergift bör ses som en mera allmän möjlighet som domstolarna kan använda för att undvika uppenbart oskäliga resultat vid påföljdsbestämningen när inte andra möjligheter står till buds.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2014."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-245",
  "softwareVersion": "932b2ac0d624024c",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2014-s-245, NJA 2014 s. 245, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-245 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:52f32e52f6b2b99b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2014-s-245/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:19e5f7726aaae664848d8600a30e253a891e0305db6d949f78de989b0ff4dc4d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:19e5f7726aaae664848d8600a30e253a891e0305db6d949f78de989b0ff4dc4d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:06:37.056Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2014-s-245",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}