{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-966",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:08aebf4628533b7348c0c570dacf63717455b7a9a5570f507bfc901e059ae27b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2013 s. 966, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2013-s-966",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-966",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2013 s. 966, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Beräkningen av skälig ersättning enligt lagen (2000:171) om förbud beträffande viss avkodningsutrustning ska grunda sig på den tid under vilken det olovliga utnyttjandet har ägt rum och på den avgift som tas ut vid lovligt nyttjande.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2013."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-966",
  "softwareVersion": "56a1a0de9f3d5fd8",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2013-s-966, NJA 2013 s. 966, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-966 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:9f6115d5b0273328, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2013-s-966/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:08aebf4628533b7348c0c570dacf63717455b7a9a5570f507bfc901e059ae27b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:08aebf4628533b7348c0c570dacf63717455b7a9a5570f507bfc901e059ae27b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:14:39.031Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-966",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}