{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-780",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:daab0af1f377946d59522178d737b81e1cea2ca84ff9395b6c2c40a4f3cf5c21",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2013 s. 780, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2013-s-780",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-780",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2013 s. 780, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Om åtal har väckts innan Skatteverket har beslutat om skattetillägg, så kan inte förbudet mot dubbla lagföringar och straff föranleda att en lagakraftvunnen brottmålsdom undanröjs, och det oberoende av när beslutet om skattetillägg vann laga kraft.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2013."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-780",
  "softwareVersion": "4898bca0b815c02b",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2013-s-780, NJA 2013 s. 780, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-780 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:347eb86af74d13c2, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2013-s-780/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:daab0af1f377946d59522178d737b81e1cea2ca84ff9395b6c2c40a4f3cf5c21",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:daab0af1f377946d59522178d737b81e1cea2ca84ff9395b6c2c40a4f3cf5c21",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T13:11:22.910Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2013-s-780",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}