{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-886","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-886)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:722d89","proof":"sha256:902c3a29f9d4826b851961c47bf504ac49538474000b10ad47cbda8427da1798","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2012 s. 886, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2012-s-886","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-886","inLanguage":"sv","about":"Fråga om ansvar för bedrägeri och bidragsbrott","abstract":["Vad som hände: Bevisningen om att den tilltalade, som led av bl.a.","Vad domstolen sa: Underlåten anmälan till Försäkringskassan om ändrade förhållanden som har haft betydelse för rätt till sjukersättning (förtidspension) har ansetts utgöra en gärning vid varje utbetalningstillfälle.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2012."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-886","softwareVersion":"19b4a95079967ecd","citation":"avgorande-nja-2012-s-886, NJA 2012 s. 886, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-886 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:defa64711695c6c5, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2012-s-886/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:902c3a29f9d4826b851961c47bf504ac49538474000b10ad47cbda8427da1798","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T07:01:46","content_hash":"sha256:902c3a29f9d4826b851961c47bf504ac49538474000b10ad47cbda8427da1798","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T08:07:01.259Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-886","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2012-s-886/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}