{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-776",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6d93236e7608dd850144e24f468dc3b6125664d3ad01768563a7566959c55dc7",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2012 s. 776, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2012-s-776",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-776",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2012 s. 776, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett avtalsvillkor om automatisk förlängning vid avtal om gymkort har ansetts oskäligt när avtalstiden och förlängningen löpte under ett år och konsumenten inte hade fått någon påminnelse om att uppsägning skulle ske.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2012. Tillämpar Avtalslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-776",
  "softwareVersion": "e820eb056da870f4",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2012-s-776, NJA 2012 s. 776, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-776 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:8fe4cf497268b28f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2012-s-776/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6d93236e7608dd850144e24f468dc3b6125664d3ad01768563a7566959c55dc7",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6d93236e7608dd850144e24f468dc3b6125664d3ad01768563a7566959c55dc7",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:08:13.661Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-776",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}