{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-336",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:5e192f8d32b258899a8acf94c5fdcd34860de2eae2f60e0c5e4061a0dcd57fea",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2012 s. 336, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2012-s-336",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-336",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2012 s. 336, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En tingsrätts beslut att, innan åtal har väckts, förordna offentlig försvarare för den misstänkte har ansetts inte vara omfattat av sekretess och har lämnats ut trots att den misstänktes identitet därmed har avslöjats.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2012. Tillämpar OSL."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-336",
  "softwareVersion": "0cf5c814f1701214",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2012-s-336, NJA 2012 s. 336, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-336 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a9273397acd0865c, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2012-s-336/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:5e192f8d32b258899a8acf94c5fdcd34860de2eae2f60e0c5e4061a0dcd57fea",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:5e192f8d32b258899a8acf94c5fdcd34860de2eae2f60e0c5e4061a0dcd57fea",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:10:57.224Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-336",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}