{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-563","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-563)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-25","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:1c64c2","proof":"sha256:2021391263d309bd6003a45b3d758fff60c3f6657938c61d185b53f9494a5e5a","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2011 s. 563, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2011-s-563","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-563","inLanguage":"sv","about":"NJA 2011 s. 563, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad domstolen sa: Bestämmelsen i 1 kap. 2 § andra stycket brottsbalken om självförvållat rus och liknande tillstånd har ansetts inte innebära att de krav på uppsåt som annars gäller för ansvar ska efterges. (Jfr NJA 1973 s. 590)","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2011."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-563","softwareVersion":"578c3a31c97c81a8","citation":"avgorande-nja-2011-s-563, NJA 2011 s. 563, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-563 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:054d37c0a9d16712, bygge legal-2026-09-25).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-563/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:2021391263d309bd6003a45b3d758fff60c3f6657938c61d185b53f9494a5e5a","version":"legal-2026-09-25","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-25+legal-2026-09-25+2026-09-25T21:24:40","content_hash":"sha256:2021391263d309bd6003a45b3d758fff60c3f6657938c61d185b53f9494a5e5a","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T02:48:34.617Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-563","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-563/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}