{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-411","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-411)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:c1e435","proof":"sha256:df3be707ed3bff081adf058d45bef744c26c0290718b6cc912af65ac205614a3","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2011 s. 411, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2011-s-411","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-411","inLanguage":"sv","about":"NJA 2011 s. 411, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad som hände: Domstol har försatt en person i konkurs på grundval av skattebeslut som inte vunnit laga kraft.","Vad domstolen sa: Domstolen har underlåtit att självständigt pröva om det fanns en skattefordran och har direkt lagt skattebesluten till grund för obeståndsbedömningen.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2011."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-411","softwareVersion":"eabf1a08a09512b5","citation":"avgorande-nja-2011-s-411, NJA 2011 s. 411, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-411 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:c5db6b5a488e96cd, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-411/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:df3be707ed3bff081adf058d45bef744c26c0290718b6cc912af65ac205614a3","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T05:14:22","content_hash":"sha256:df3be707ed3bff081adf058d45bef744c26c0290718b6cc912af65ac205614a3","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T06:27:59.529Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-411","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-411/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}