{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-15","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-15)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:a3d8f7","proof":"sha256:6ab6714a578744df01feda3e9c65ce3afe1ba7ba77e5417634a84579b6df9c1b","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2011 s. 15, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2011-s-15","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-15","inLanguage":"sv","about":"NJA 2011 s. 15, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad domstolen sa: Underåriga rättssökande som omfattas av rättsskyddet i moderns hemförsäkring har ansetts inte kunna beviljas rättshjälp, när modern, som är de underårigas ställföreträdare, har underlåtit att ta rättsskyddet i anspråk.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2011."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-15","softwareVersion":"fc2c6bab3439876d","citation":"avgorande-nja-2011-s-15, NJA 2011 s. 15, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-15 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:1d033804e5716a2c, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-15/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:6ab6714a578744df01feda3e9c65ce3afe1ba7ba77e5417634a84579b6df9c1b","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T09:13:21","content_hash":"sha256:6ab6714a578744df01feda3e9c65ce3afe1ba7ba77e5417634a84579b6df9c1b","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T10:19:54.404Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-15","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-15/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}