{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-342","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-342)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:a663d9","proof":"sha256:436e955692c5f2df9a463b6ab985d6b8f3838c0a3c3b031002a45207591d2410","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2010 s. 342, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2010-s-342","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-342","inLanguage":"sv","about":"Fråga om hovrätt bort meddela prövningstillstånd på grund av synnerliga skäl när rättegångsfel förekommit i tingsrätten","abstract":["Vad som hände: Felets inverkan på målets utgång (I = Ö 4919-08).","Vad domstolen sa: Avhjälpande i hovrätten (II = Ö 1302-10).","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2010."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-342","softwareVersion":"1c3de9a46c204966","citation":"avgorande-nja-2010-s-342, NJA 2010 s. 342, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-342 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:06eaa9435061b345, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2010-s-342/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:436e955692c5f2df9a463b6ab985d6b8f3838c0a3c3b031002a45207591d2410","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T06:14:05","content_hash":"sha256:436e955692c5f2df9a463b6ab985d6b8f3838c0a3c3b031002a45207591d2410","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T07:20:25.681Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-342","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2010-s-342/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}