{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-112","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-112)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-25","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:914059","proof":"sha256:b4e6fcae9b867f8673232dfa31949b6dc999aa71d13c7c8e81c671f28d82417e","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2010 s. 112, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2010-s-112","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-112","inLanguage":"sv","about":"NJA 2010 s. 112, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad domstolen sa: En klagande i ett bygglovsärende har ansetts inte vara berättigad till skadestånd för rättegångskostnader som föranletts av oriktig myndighetsutövning av kommunen. 3 kap. 2 § skadeståndslagen (1972:207) och artikel 1 i första tilläggsprotokollet till Europakonventionen.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2010."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-112","softwareVersion":"bd980d7a94e59e55","citation":"avgorande-nja-2010-s-112, NJA 2010 s. 112, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-112 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:33bac1c433572293, bygge legal-2026-09-25).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2010-s-112/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:b4e6fcae9b867f8673232dfa31949b6dc999aa71d13c7c8e81c671f28d82417e","version":"legal-2026-09-25","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-25+legal-2026-09-25+2026-09-25T21:24:40","content_hash":"sha256:b4e6fcae9b867f8673232dfa31949b6dc999aa71d13c7c8e81c671f28d82417e","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T04:10:18.980Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2010-s-112","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2010-s-112/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}