{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2009-s-102","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2009-s-102)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:20cbc7","proof":"sha256:f368f27e3db47d04c167935849deb9089a3facad8033c6575882ebeaf35ede6b","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2009 s. 102, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2009-s-102","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2009-s-102","inLanguage":"sv","about":"NJA 2009 s. 102, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad domstolen sa: Ansökan om resning och klagan över domvilla i ett mål som prövats av en kommun i första instans och avgjorts av Miljööverdomstolen som slutinstans har ansetts böra prövas enligt bestämmelserna för tvistemål i 58 och 59 kap. rättegångsbalken.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2009."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2009-s-102","softwareVersion":"9aa5352ab1e3e30d","citation":"avgorande-nja-2009-s-102, NJA 2009 s. 102, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2009-s-102 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:5e504d25c191a3a5, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2009-s-102/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:f368f27e3db47d04c167935849deb9089a3facad8033c6575882ebeaf35ede6b","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T09:13:21","content_hash":"sha256:f368f27e3db47d04c167935849deb9089a3facad8033c6575882ebeaf35ede6b","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T10:17:51.872Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2009-s-102","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2009-s-102/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}