{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2008-s-120","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2008-s-120)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:5951c1","proof":"sha256:61338f548d22d8373dfbea60ddc8c8f183ec07da847605c17f6f3d7285833865","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"NJA 2008 s. 120, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-nja-2008-s-120","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2008-s-120","inLanguage":"sv","about":"NJA 2008 s. 120, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad som hände: I tvistemål mellan färjeoperatör och kommunalt hamnbolag om nedsättning av hamnavgifter bl.a. på grund av missbruk av dominerande ställning har del av färjeoperatörens talan avvisats på grund av ett skiljeavtal.","Vad domstolen sa: Vidare har den kommunala självkostnadsprincipen ansetts inte vara tillämplig på hamnbolaget.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2008."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2008-s-120","softwareVersion":"69145ac3d2bd0367","citation":"avgorande-nja-2008-s-120, NJA 2008 s. 120, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2008-s-120 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:1cb4274d89a589f7, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2008-s-120/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:61338f548d22d8373dfbea60ddc8c8f183ec07da847605c17f6f3d7285833865","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T07:09:56","content_hash":"sha256:61338f548d22d8373dfbea60ddc8c8f183ec07da847605c17f6f3d7285833865","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T09:00:27.515Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2008-s-120","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2008-s-120/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}