{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2001-s-865",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:84feaaf17a4f5daeca7528a3c6597bb56f5efd818dfc842c27a70b9a13b9f6bc",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 2001 s. 865, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-2001-s-865",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2001-s-865",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 2001 s. 865, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett före år 1988 mellan makar upprättat inbördes testamente med förbehåll för bröstarvinges laglott har vid bestämmande av arvsskatt tolkats så att bröstarvingarna inte erhållit rätt att vid den först avlidne makens frånfälle utfå laglott.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 2001. Tillämpar Ärvdabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2001-s-865",
  "softwareVersion": "d52cb1d9191c8466",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-2001-s-865, NJA 2001 s. 865, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2001-s-865 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f2e02d11fb658d2a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2001-s-865/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:84feaaf17a4f5daeca7528a3c6597bb56f5efd818dfc842c27a70b9a13b9f6bc",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:84feaaf17a4f5daeca7528a3c6597bb56f5efd818dfc842c27a70b9a13b9f6bc",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:09:33.673Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2001-s-865",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}