{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1995-s-148",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:f5cac75348af0094e43309f6cbb2778f0f6e5a19362d0691b7c86052c864d234",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1995 s. 148, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1995-s-148",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1995-s-148",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga, vid ansökan om att ett dödsbo skall avträdas till förvaltning av boutredningsman, under vilka förutsättningar den som åberopar ett tvistigt anspråk på universell testamentsrätt skall kunna provisoriskt anses som dödsbodelägare",
  "abstract": [
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1995. Tillämpar Ärvdabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1995-s-148",
  "softwareVersion": "37498457b5abfce7",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1995-s-148, NJA 1995 s. 148, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1995-s-148 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:02326225e953c37b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1995-s-148/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:f5cac75348af0094e43309f6cbb2778f0f6e5a19362d0691b7c86052c864d234",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:f5cac75348af0094e43309f6cbb2778f0f6e5a19362d0691b7c86052c864d234",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:07:48.776Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1995-s-148",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}