{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1992-s-256",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9ee30e5b9833cc7f816d3d510d5047abe00a2c4d4ecd5815a81603f089de0cc0",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1992 s. 256, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1992-s-256",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1992-s-256",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1992 s. 256, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: A, som avbrutit sin skolgång innan hon fyllt 18 år, fick innan hon fyllde 19 år besked om att hon antagits till en kompletteringskurs, som hon därefter påbörjade sedan hon fyllt 19 år.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Skolgången har inte ansetts återupptagen före 19-årsdagen. 7 kap 1 § 2 st FB.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1992. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1992-s-256",
  "softwareVersion": "e62e3079f6179e2e",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1992-s-256, NJA 1992 s. 256, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1992-s-256 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:693a6cba51ece5d9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1992-s-256/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9ee30e5b9833cc7f816d3d510d5047abe00a2c4d4ecd5815a81603f089de0cc0",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9ee30e5b9833cc7f816d3d510d5047abe00a2c4d4ecd5815a81603f089de0cc0",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:12:41.919Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1992-s-256",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}