{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1991-s-682",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:8589f3d23dc5dfbfa614a048055f3d9bc51fb894b6c6a01ec6e1ec0a4b8c1d75",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1991 s. 682, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1991-s-682",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1991-s-682",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1991 s. 682, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En klausul rörande mäklarprovision i ett mellan en redare och en befraktare ingånget certeparti har ansetts som en integrerande del av avtalsförhållandet mellan mäklaren och befraktaren och därför kunna av mäklaren såsom avtalspart åberopas som grund för anspråk gentemot befraktaren.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1991. Tillämpar Avtalslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1991-s-682",
  "softwareVersion": "4c188dc72a2ed591",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1991-s-682, NJA 1991 s. 682, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1991-s-682 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:0681324e3578978d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1991-s-682/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:8589f3d23dc5dfbfa614a048055f3d9bc51fb894b6c6a01ec6e1ec0a4b8c1d75",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:8589f3d23dc5dfbfa614a048055f3d9bc51fb894b6c6a01ec6e1ec0a4b8c1d75",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:10:54.302Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1991-s-682",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}