{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-24",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:cc24ab697734e99315905ce3f5062ea153426bd8828a3c875614548120dc9615",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1990 s. 24, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1990-s-24",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-24",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1990 s. 24, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett i entreprenadavtal använt uttryck \"samtliga arbeten\" har ansetts omfatta även sådana arbeten som efter entreprenadens godkännande vid slutbesiktning skulle utföras för att rätta till de vid denna besiktning konstaterade felen och bristerna.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1990. Tillämpar Avtalslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-24",
  "softwareVersion": "25481191a1f0507b",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1990-s-24, NJA 1990 s. 24, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-24 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4b6c5b7d1354587e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1990-s-24/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:cc24ab697734e99315905ce3f5062ea153426bd8828a3c875614548120dc9615",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:cc24ab697734e99315905ce3f5062ea153426bd8828a3c875614548120dc9615",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:05:59.811Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-24",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}