{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-219",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:be88e1d65ce49131022d2c33fcc2b629a148b1c4d3ec058e9ee4769c452761ff",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1990 s. 219, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1990-s-219",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-219",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1990 s. 219, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Föreskrifter, som meddelas av domstol i beslut i umgängesfråga, kan i undantagsfall innefatta angivande av på vilken plats umgänget skall påbörjas och avslutas samt hur umgängeskostnaderna skall fördelas mellan vårdnadshavaren och den med vilken barnet har rätt till umgänge.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1990. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-219",
  "softwareVersion": "dddb731f381016fd",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1990-s-219, NJA 1990 s. 219, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-219 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:65d6433ace8a5918, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1990-s-219/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:be88e1d65ce49131022d2c33fcc2b629a148b1c4d3ec058e9ee4769c452761ff",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:be88e1d65ce49131022d2c33fcc2b629a148b1c4d3ec058e9ee4769c452761ff",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:21:34.393Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1990-s-219",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}