{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-194",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1dd9093f43cbd0c96e6af96dc9944fe924f3bd11412de818dcd668c7c081212d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1987 s. 194, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1987-s-194",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-194",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1987 s. 194, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Då åtal väckts för skattebedrägeri har frågan om ansvar för vårdslös skatteuppgift inte ansetts kunna komma under bedömande utan att åtalet justerats före utgången av preskriptionstiden för sistnämnda brott.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1987. Tillämpar Skattebrottslagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-194",
  "softwareVersion": "99a72fbe4a901dd6",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1987-s-194, NJA 1987 s. 194, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-194 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:183d6f1408ffccea, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1987-s-194/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1dd9093f43cbd0c96e6af96dc9944fe924f3bd11412de818dcd668c7c081212d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1dd9093f43cbd0c96e6af96dc9944fe924f3bd11412de818dcd668c7c081212d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:24:54.026Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-194",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}