{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-116",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:cb0dce54b2c1386b48488f83e452e45d56392c7a178ff6a593e0186a7c3ef0bb",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "NJA 1987 s. 116, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-nja-1987-s-116",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-116",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "NJA 1987 s. 116, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ansökan av en man om att få till adoptivbarn anta sin hustrus barn med en annan man har med hänsyn till omständigheterna bifallits, trots att den andre mannen motsatt sig adoptionen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Högsta domstolen, 1987. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-116",
  "softwareVersion": "cfe320731d033396",
  "citation": "avgorande-nja-1987-s-116, NJA 1987 s. 116, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-116 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3d22128a3963e0e1, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1987-s-116/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:cb0dce54b2c1386b48488f83e452e45d56392c7a178ff6a593e0186a7c3ef0bb",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:cb0dce54b2c1386b48488f83e452e45d56392c7a178ff6a593e0186a7c3ef0bb",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:12:56.096Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1987-s-116",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}